escort gaziantep escort gaziantep escort gaziantep escort gaziantep escort gaziantep escort gaziantep escort gaziantep escort gaziantep escort gaziantep escort gaziantep escort gaziantep escort gaziantep escort gaziantep escort gaziantep

Statement

“Landscape is both imagination and livelihood, the setting for human stories that are made as well as
inherited”.

Ken Worpole from Landscape and Identity
http://www.opendemocracy.net/ecology-landscape/article_869.jsp

The overriding concern of my work is topophilia – the affective bond between people and place – and, by
extension, things defined by topophilic association. My work is informed by a wealth of sources; to list the
currently most significant: in philosophy, Heidegger’s discussions of “home” and it’s relationship to his
notion of “authentic” experience; in the area of human & political geography, the ideas of, among others, Yi-
Fu Tuan, Edward Relph & Tim Cresswell and in cultural anthropology, those of Edmund Carpenter and
Marc Augé. Over the past few years, storytelling and the “memory map” work of novelist, cultural historian
and mythologist, Marina Warner have become especially influential.

Photography is an extraordinarily complex medium. I both love and distrust it. At the simplest
level, I am as easily seduced now as ever by the clarity, detail and delicacy of a fine print and
find it’s relationship to time and capacity for suggesting memory both stimulating and deeply
mysterious. I also love its unique, indexical relationship to reality yet, it is this quality too that
produces my greatest unease. From my earliest years photographing on the Canadian prairie, the
world has always seemed so much larger, more profound and interesting than any picture I could
make of it. No matter how accurate its re-presentation, a photograph of the world can never be
more than a shadow. Yet, such is photography’s iconic power, the present surfeit of its production,
be it still image, film or video, contributes hugely I believe, to the degradation of our perception
and ultimately, valuation of the world. Sometimes, a picture can seem to be worth more than the
pictured.

Therefore, in all my work, I seek to incorporate a critique of the role of the photographic image as a
mediator and, increasingly it seems, constructor of experience. Over the many years of my career I have
employed any number of means to achieve this but, for the past twenty-five the most prevalent has been
the 360° panorama.

In 1978 I obtained a camera that on a single roll of film makes just four images, each encompassing
a quarter of the perceptual circumference. Rotating 90° horizontally between exposures thus records
everything around it, from its centre to the encircling horizon; one roll of film, one image and the possibility
of exhibiting in any of four, different coherencies. While what results is, of course, no more capable of
addressing the dichotomy between actuality and image than is a Mercator Projection of the globe, the
inherent perceptual oddness does seem to draw attention to it in a unique way.

For all my distrust though, I have come to recognize that photographs remain and
will always be remarkable containers of stories, even if we have to make them up. As with so much else,
Shakespeare had it right here too; the world is a stage or, more accurately perhaps, an infinite number of
intersecting and overlapping stages upon which each of us lives out our own stories and creates our own
lives. Used well and with integrity, photography can contribute to our understanding of the play.